Featured
Salah stays, 2 players sign – 5 things we want from Liverpool in January transfer window
Liverpool were record-breakingly busy in the summer transfer window, but with January approaching the ailing Premier League champions have more priorities to address.
Despite their remarkable £446.2 million summer spend, Liverpool are in a worse position than this time last year.
Therefore, with the transfer window reopening on January 1 it is not wrong to suggest that there is cause for another busy month for Richard Hughes and his recruitment team.
Liverpool’s January Wishlist: At a Glance
• The Salah stance: Putting the Saudi noise to bed and securing his future
• The defensive fix: Why Marc Guehi is No. 1 target – and Ligue 1 talent the perfect fallback
• The loan reset: Resolving Harvey Elliott‘s “untenable” situation and finding the right senior path for Trey Nyoni
• Semenyo alternative: Why Liverpool must sign another attacker if Antoine Semenyo chooses Man City
• The contract priority: Avoiding another ‘Trent saga’ with Ibrahima Konate
Here are five things we want to see from Liverpool in the January transfer window, including a decision on Mohamed Salah‘s future.
Put the Saudi rumours to bed and keep Mo Salah

Salah’s situation was resolved to an extent before he departed for the Africa Cup of Nations: an impressive comeback against Brighton saw the return of an elite-level professional.
But it will no doubt be revisited upon the Egyptian’s return from the mid-season tournament, as word is his rift with Slot is not exactly repaired.
Liverpool are insistent they do not wish to lose Salah in January, but a transfer cannot be ruled out if he remains frustrated and the riches of Saudi Arabia loom.
The prospect of one of the club’s best-ever players leaving under a winter cloud is unacceptable, and above any need for signings, ensuring Salah’s commitment at least until the end of the season is essential.
Solve the centre-back issue: Sign Guehi or a smart fallback

With Giovanni Leoni ruled out for the rest of the season and Joe Gomez almost exclusively required at right-back when fit himself, the load on Virgil van Dijk and Ibrahima Konate has been relentless.
That was not the plan, of course, with Liverpool having come as close as you can to signing Marc Guehi from Crystal Palace on deadline day.
Palace chairman Steve Parish’s U-turn was devastating, but it did underline the risk taken when delaying any deal for the England centre-back until the very end of the transfer window.
Put simply, Liverpool need to sign a new centre-back – and Guehi remains the No. 1 target.
Much will depend on whether Palace are willing to do business in January – knowing they will lose their captain and most valuable player on a free at the end of the season if they don’t – but Liverpool may need to pivot if not.
Given at least two centre-backs are required in the long term (more on that later), a move for a secondary target such as Rennes youngster Jeremy Jacquet would be an ideal fallback.
Sort out the loans: Bring Elliott back and find a home for Nyoni

Five appearances short of triggering his £35 million permanent move and with seemingly no chance of meeting that target, Harvey Elliott‘s situation at Aston Villa is untenable.
It is hard to argue with his standing in their squad, either, given Villa’s remarkable fortunes under Unai Emery this season.
But given Liverpool are light of options in midfield and out wide, Elliott returning to Anfield could be an ideal solution.
Liverpool may argue otherwise when it comes to business sense, having viewed their deal with Villa as an all-but-guaranteed sale.

Elliott’s is not the only loan that will need to be assessed in January, with Kostas Tsimikas (Roma), James McConnell (Ajax) and Lewis Koumas (Birmingham) all struggling for game time and potentially returning early.
There are others currently at Liverpool who would benefit from a mid-season loan, namely Trey Nyoni, who trains with the first team regularly but barely features and is in need of starting football at senior level.
Sign an alternative if Semenyo joins Man City

While signing a centre-back is a priority in terms of incomings, injury to Alexander Isak has magnified the need for another versatile forward – also with an eye on future-proofing for life after Salah.
The primary candidate in that respect was Bournemouth‘s Antoine Semenyo, but he now appears set on joining Man City in a deal worth £65 million.
Clearly, Liverpool had other plans, and the hope is that those include signing an alternative, unless reports speculating Liverpool could yet hijack the move come to fruition.
Paris Saint-Germain’s Bradley Barcola, Real Madrid‘s Rodrygo and Dortmund’s Karim Adeyemi have all been touted as options and Liverpool are known to have long-standing interest in all three.
Given Cody Gakpo is the de facto first choice on the left – with Rio Ngumoha too young to play consistently at the top level – signing a player like Barcola in January could provide much-needed competition and more end product.
Tie down Ibrahima Konate and avoid another contract saga

The centre-back issue has been magnified by the knowledge that Konate is yet to sign a new contract and, while often underperforming, could be planning to leave on a free transfer in the summer.
Liverpool have presented the Frenchman’s representatives with an offer but as of yet there has been no resolution to ongoing talks.
With Konate able to formally speak to clubs outside of England from January 1, it could provide a timely juncture when it comes to determining his future.
The club will have wanted to avoid another prolonged contract saga, but that is the situation they are in.
It was only in April when Van Dijk and Salah signed their latest deals, while Trent Alexander-Arnold‘s decision to leave was announced in May, but January should prompt closure when it comes to Konate.
Featured
A former PGMOL chief (Dermot Gallagher ) felt there was insufficient evidence to award a penalty, agreeing that the referee’s decision to play on was reasonable.
A former PGMOL chief (Dermot Gallagher ) felt there was insufficient evidence to award a penalty, agreeing that the referee’s decision to play on was reasonable. �
I searched for Dermot Gallagher’s comments specifically on the Jeremie Frimpong penalty controversy fromArsenal vs Liverpool yesterday (8 Jan 2026) and here’s the current picture:
🔍 Was Gallagher reported to have spoken on the Frimpong incident
Frimpong went down in the Arsenal box after a challenge, but no penalty was given by referee Anthony Taylor. �
The Guardian
The referee and VAR did not stop play or award a spot-kick, and the game continued into a 0–0 draw. �
📌 What did we find about ex-official opinions?
A former PGMOL chief (Keith Hackett) felt there was insufficient evidence to award a penalty, agreeing that the referee’s decision to play on was reasonable. �
Football Insider
🧠 About Dermot Gallagher and penalty analyses in general
In other recent matches, Gallagher has discussed penalties on Sky Sports’ “Ref Watch”, often focusing on whether VAR intervention was clear and obvious or whether the referee correctly applied law regarding touching the ball vs foul contact. �
Sky Sports
However, no current reliable source shows Gallagher commenting on the Frimpong incident specifically.
⚠️ Twitter/Unofficial mentions
There are some unverified social posts claiming he might have commented (e.g., that it “should have been a penalty” or phrasing like “It’s irrelevant after the game…”), but these aren’t from credible news outlets or confirmed quotes at this time. �
Threads
If you want, I can check again later once analysis shows up from Sky Sports or another primary broadcaster with official quotes from Dermot Gallagher on that exact Frimpong penalty call.
Featured
Arsenal v Liverpool | Match in 5 | Premier League
Analyse the numbers behind Liverpool’s goalless stalemate away against Arsenal in the Premier League.

The Reds took a point from their trip to Emirates Stadium on Thursday evening, extending their unbeaten run to 10 matches in the process too.
Explore statistics from the encounter via the Opta tools below.
Match Stats
Arsenal 0 0 Liverpool
English Premier League
08/01/26
GeneralDistributionAttack
Possession
47.6% 47.6%52.4% 52.4%
Duels success rate
48.5% 48.5%51.5% 51.5%
Aerial duels won
54.5% 54.5%45.5% 45.5%
Interceptions
7 78 8
Offsides
2 21 1
Corners won
3 30 0
Average Positions
Arsenal 0 0 Liverpool
HT 0-0
English Premier League
08/01/26
Venue
Emirates Stadium
Attendance
60,258
Referee
Anthony Taylor
Featured
Ex-PGMOL chief makes his feelings clear over Jeremie Frimpong penalty call vs Arsenal
Referee Anthony Taylor was in a good position to judge the challenge on Liverpool’s Jeremie Frimpong inside Arsenal’s penalty area.
That is according to former PGMOL chief and ex-FIFA referee, Keith Hackett, who exclusively told Football Insider that there was “insufficient evidence” to award a spot-kick at the Emirates on Thursday, 8 January.
With Mohamed Salah away with Egypt on international duty, Frimpong has been trusted in the right-wing position, and he caused issues for the Gunners’ back line on the counter-attack.
In the 35th minute, Mikel Arteta‘s side played on while the 25-year-old went down holding his ankle, with Liverpool fans crying out for a penalty against Piero Hincapie, but calls fell upon deaf ears.
Hackett has criticised Taylor previously in the season, but the referee was applauded for his actions on this occasion, much to the frustration of travelling fans.
Anthony Taylor spot-on to deny Jeremie Frimpong penalty shout
Speaking exclusively to Football Insider, the former referee said: “Referee Anthony Taylor is in a good position, and there is insufficient evidence that there is contact. Therefore, play was allowed to continue.
“VAR, at this point, is in a position to look at various camera angles to seek and determine if the referee has made a clear and obvious error. There was no request for the referee to visit the pitch-side monitor.
In real time, there appeared to barely be a touch on the player, but upon watching the replays, there did appear to be a slight tangle of ankles, but unlikely to be enough for a penalty.
Liverpool could have been awarded a penalty in the second half
After picking up the first caution of the game, Leandro Trossard was involved once again, almost giving away a spot-kick just three minutes into the second half.
Bundling Florian Wirtz over in the box, Gary Neville blasted the player’s “clumsy” challenge, labelling it a “risk,” but after a VAR check, the Gunners got away with another controversial incident.
There were several controversial incidents during the game, but this was likely the most dangerous, with Trossard already walking a tightrope, having picked up his yellow card in the 12th minute.
While a VAR check ruled that the referee got the right decision, many will be in disagreement, and those arguments are bound to continue well beyond the final whistle.
-
Featured3 months agoVAR AND REFEREE ERROR Why Manchester United goal stood despite head injury to Liverpool star Alexis Mac Allister
-
ARSENAL'2 months agoArsenal’s next five fixtures compared to Liverpool and Man City after Crystal Palace win
-
Liverpool3 months agoPremier League explains two controversial Liverpool penalty decisions as referee replaced
-
ARSENAL INJURY UPDATE2 months agoGabriel Jesus training footage sends clear message to Mikel Arteta ahead of Tottenham clash
-
Featured2 months agocentre-backs available THIS SUMMER for Liverpool FC
-
Arsenal predicted XI3 months agoFulham 0-1 Arsenal 69: NO PENALTY! Finally the decision is made. Anthony Taylor steps away from the screen and announces that Kevin played the ball. It seemed pretty clear but it took an age to get there.
-
Liverpool3 months agoGOAL! Brentford 2-1 Liverpool | Kerkez ’45+5
-
Arsenal predicted XI3 months agoFormer Arsenal star training with first-team ahead of Atletico Madrid
